CONSTANTINE P.
CAVAFY
[
FRAGMENT ON LYCANTHROPY ]
[…] Be made clearer when we consider the abundance of wolves in the northern parts of Europe. In England alone we are told[1] they were so numerous that King Edgar, 959-975 A.D., in order to extirpate them exacted from the Welsh a yearly tribute of three hundred wolves’ heads. The villages, and even the towns, were little protected against their raids; and, indeed, when we read of wolves entering inn great numbers in Paris about the XVth century A.D., forcing the citizens to shut themselves up in their houses for shelter, and at last departing carrying away with them as a booty many children of tender age much of the mystery encircling the origin of the «loups-garous» is dispelled. I cannot help quoting on this head Lord Tennyson:
And ever and anon the wolf would steal
The children and devour, but now and
then,
Her own brood lost or dead, lent her
fierce teat
To human sucklings: and the children,
housed
In her foul den, there at their meat
would growl,
And mock their foster-mother on four
feet,
Till, straighten’d, they grew up to
wolf-like men,
Worse than the wolves.[2]
as
well as a clever letter addressed by a resident in India to an anonymous
gentleman of Broughton-in-Furness:[3]
«When in Oude in India, twenty-six years ago, we heard of several instances of
native babies carried off by she-wolves, and placed with their whelps and
brought up wild there; there was one about when we were there, partially
reclaimed, but retaining much of the savage nature imbibed with the wolf’s
milk, and having been accustomed to go on all fours – i.e. knees and elbows;
but these I concluded were not affected with ‘lycanthropy’». Far from arriving
at the same conclusion I believe this of all phases of lycanthropy to be the most
sure.
M. Charles Richet, in
an article entitled «The Demoniaes of Old Time», contributed to the Revue
des Deux Mondes for February1880, dwells somewhat at length on lycanthropy.
To begin with the XVth century down to the «middle of the XVIth there is little
witchcraft» he observes «in France but on the contrary there is much
lycanthropy. We must identify the men-wolves with the sorcerers for they are
very much alike. At times the man-wolf is the devil, at times a real wold under
Satan’s influence, but the oftenest it is a magician who transforms himself
into a beast, and runs about the fields in that shape as better calculated to
harm the faithful. The old French writers speak with terror of the men-wolves
or garwalls who devour young children:
Many
men became garwalls.
Garwalls
is a fierce beast
Which
in the height of fury
Devours
men, works many evils.
And
hurries on traversing large forests.[4]
A name has been given to this sort of
madness, they have called lycanthropes (men-wolves) the miserable creatures who
fancy they are changed into beasts. In those centuries of misery and ignorance
lycanthropy was epidemical. Many imagined that they were covered with hair,
that they were armed with talons and formidable teeth, that they had torn to
pieces in their nightly excursions men, animals, and above all children. Some
lycanthropes were surprised in the open country with blood and filth, and
carrying fragments of corpses».
Esquirol, a trustworthy French writer,
furnishes in his book on «Mental Maladies»[5]
a similar description of men-wolves, or lycanthropes:
«This terrible affliction began to
manifest itself in France in the XVth century, and the name of ‘loups-garous’
has been given to the sufferers. These unhappy beings fly from society of mankind,
and live in the woods, the cemeteries, or old ruins, prowling about the open
country only by night, howling as they go. They let their beards and nails
grow, and then seeing themselves armed with claws and covered with shaggy hair
they become confirmed in the belief that they are wolves. Impelled by ferocity
or want they throw themselves upon young children and tear, kill, and devour
them».
Whenever there was a suspicion – says my
first authority, M. Richet[6]
– of a man-wolf’s being near a village the peasantry formed themselves into a
body in order to capture and slay him; and there remains an act of the
parliament of Dôle which «desiring to prevent greater inconveniency» authorised
the inhabitants of the spots about which the man-wolf was seen to prowl to
assemble and attack him making use of offensive weapons:
«Icelle Cour, désirant obvier à plus grand
inconvénient, a permis et permet aux manants et habitants desdits lieux, et
autres, de, nonobstant les édits concernant la chasse, eux pouvoir assembler,
et avec épieux, hallebardes, piques, arquebuses, bâtons, chasser et poursuivre
ledit loup-garou par tous lieux où le pourront trouver et prendre, lier et
occire, sans pouvoir encourir aucune peine et amende».
The natural ending of these chases was the
capture of the man-wolf and his death on the stake.
Gradually the wolf became more and more
the animal whose form the witches and wizards particularly affected. «Boguet»
observes M. Richet[7] «relates seriously the story of a hunter who having struck off with a
blow of his gun the paw of a she-wolf, lost his way subsequently and sought the
hospitality of a neighbouring castle. Questioned as to whether he had been
successful in his sport he is about to produce the she-wolf’s paw when, to his
great surprise, he discovers it to be the hand of a woman. The lord of the
castle recognising on it his marriage rings runs to his wife whom he finds
hiding one of her arms covered with blood. After this, no more doubt was
possible; she was a witch and ran about the forest under the form of a
she-wolf». He would be tempted to consider the whole story a fable had not the
poor woman been burned.
The most extravagant reports touching the
men-wolves were received with credence. The physical differences, it was
averred, between them and the wolves consisted in the formers’ hair growing
interiorly between hide and flesh. Their skin being proof against all bullets
the hunters took care before attacking them to have their guns blessed in the
church of St. Hubert, patron of the chase. The lycanthropes ran as swiftly as,
and sometimes more swiftly than, the wolves. They left behind them footprints
similar to the wolves’. Their eyes were fearful and bright. They strangled bid
dogs with facility and struck off the heads of little children with their
teeth. Last of all they had the daring and the ability to execute these
abominable deeds in the very face of men.
De Lanere’s description[8] of a man-wolf condemned by the parliament of Bordeaux is in the same
time more simple and more trustworthy. He found that he was a young man twenty
or twenty-one years old, of middling height – rather short than tall for his
age. His eyes were haggard, sunk, and
black, and he dared not raise them to the face of any one present. He had by no
means an intelligent look, his trade having been that of a keeper of cattle.
His teeth were clear, long, and uncommonly large; his nails black, sunken in,
and worn. What proved plainly that he had been a man-wolf was the manner he
used his hands in order to run and catch the little children and dogs by the
neck: he had a wonderful aptitude for walking on all fours and for leaping over
ditches as a quadruped. «He moreover avowed to me» De Lanere tells us «that he
inclined to eating the flesh of young children among whom he gave his
preference to young girls as they were more tender».
I could go on multiplying these
descriptions and quotations ad eternum were it not unnecessary. What I
have said is sufficient to give the reader an idea of lycanthropy and set him
at considering whether the theory broached in the beginning of this article be
possible or probable.
I may state en passant that the
wolf – possessed of so remarkable a prominence in the superstitions of the
Middle-Ages – did not pass unnoticed or without incense among the people of
Antiquity. It was an object of adoration in three of the countries that have
been distinguished the most for their early civilization – in India, Egypt, and
Italy. In Egypt a town was raised to its honour called Lycopolis (the wolf’s
city) in which it was specially venerated.
In Teuton mythology a wolf styled Fenris
is said, with the great sea-serpent Irminsul, to have alone escaped Odin when,
like another Theseus, he purged the earth of the various monsters that
afflicted it. Unable to kill Fenris Odin at least captured and confined him in
Hell along with two other wolves who were punished for attempting to devour the
sun. The victory of Odin however over the wolves and the protection accorded by
him to the solar sphere were, according to Teuton prophecy, but temporary, for
eventually we are assured Fenris destined to break through his bonds and slay
his victor. As a necessary consequence too would the sun fall a prey to his
brother-wolves.–[9]
The word «loup-garou»,[10]
according to M. Littré, is composed of the French loup, wolf, and garou derived
– as well as «garwall» and «gerulphus»
– from the German «werewolf» i.e. man-wolf, so that «loup-garou» translated
with exactitude offers the meaning of wolf-man-wolf.
Buffon’s etymology of the word is
singularly incorrect:
«On a vu des loups accoutumés à la chair
humaine se jeter sur les hommes, attaquer le berger plutôt que le troupeau,
dévorer des femmes, emporter des enfants, &c.; on a appelé ces mauvais loups
loups-garou: c’est-à-dire loups dont il faut se garer».
[1] See Mannder’s Treasury of
Science, Milner’s England & other works.
[2] «Coming of Arthur».
[3] See Preface to Man-Wolf (a
translation of Erek.-Chatian’s Hugnes-le-Loup)
[4] Hommes plusieurs garwalls
devinrent.
Garwall,
si est beste sauvage ;
Tant
comme il est en belle rage,
Hommes
devore, grand mal fait,
Es
grands forêts traverse et vait.
[5] Vol. I, Paris, 1838.
[6] Revue des Deux Mondes, Febr. 1880. hh
[7] Id.
[8] Revue des Deux Mondes, Feb., 1880.
[9] Sainture’s Mythology of
the Rhine.
[10] This is the term generally used in
France and elsewhere in connexion with lycanthropy.